The Legal Status of Women in Restoration London

Women in the Restoration period did not have an enviable legal status. At the age of seven a girl was considered old-enough to be betrothed, while at twelve it was legal for her to be married. Until the "happy" day of her marriage, a girl was almost quite literally owned by her father. If he should have happened to die at some point while she was unmarried, the next head of the family would take her on, (typically the oldest son or the uncle). Of course, marriage did not give her any more independence as she was then the "property" of her husband and legally her status had changed from feme sole to feme covert, while he was called her "baron". A feme covert was thus not allowed to enter into any contracts or even make a will, without the permission of her husband. The law of the time specified: "That which the husband has is his own" and "that which the wife has is the husband's". (How convenient all this was for the husband...).

Reference: "Restoration London: Everyday Life in London 1660 - 1670", by Lisa Picard, published by Phoenix.

Comments

Anna said…
Yes, it is lovely isn't it! :-)))
Wednesday, 27 April, 2005
Anonymous said…
This all sounds remarkably similar to the treatment of women by the Taliban...
Wednesday, 27 April, 2005
Anna said…
Taliban a l'Anglais
Wednesday, 27 April, 2005
Anonymous said…
Actually, not really. A single woman (or widow) who had reached the age of majority (21, I think) was legally a free agent. What's being discussed mostly relates to landed heiresses (a small proportion of the female population!). And not all women were married off at 12 - far from it. The rich tended to marry younger than everyone else and to have matches made for them (although in theory no one could be forced to marry against their will), but ordinary people on average got married in their mid-20s, and chose their own partners. The part about all property in a marriage belonging to the husband is correct, though - mind you, most people had so little property that the idea of coverture was virtually irrelevant to them anyway. Yes, women were legally disadvantaged in a host of ways, but it really wasn't like being under the Taliban.

(An excellent recent survey is _Women in early modern England_ by Sara Mendelson and Patricia Crawford.)
Thursday, 28 April, 2005
Anna said…
No, you're right, not like the Taliban. My comment a l'Anglais, was really meant to be taken lightly as the similarity lies in the fact that women (whether privilidged or not) really did not have any rights at all (not in the sense we know them) and a husband could pretty much treat his wife any way that pleased him best. Of course you are right, this applied mainly to the people in the upper classes and not to the average person. As usual, history focuses alot on the privilidged classes so we don't get to hear much about the rest of the people, who were and still are the majority. Thanks for the corrections, I appreciate it. :-)
Thursday, 28 April, 2005
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Catherine the Great and her Many Lovers

Image
Catherine the Great was empress of Russia from 1762 until she died in 1796. She was born in 1729 in Poland and in 1744 was taken to Russia to marry the young Grand Duke Peter, heir to the throne and not of a sane mind. For seven years during their marriage Peter spent his time playing with toy soldiers and dogs and showed no interest in sex. In fact he had a physical disability, a very tight foreskin, which may have played an important part in that matter. Finally the empress Elizabeth gave Catherine the permission to take a lover, which she did and was soon pregnant. She convinced Peter it was his own child, as was the plan anyway. In the meantime he had been circumcised so that he could perform the sexual act. Catherine developed a taste for young soldiers. She had a special area built in her bedroom, which was curtained off and where she received her lovers. Gregory Orlov was her on and off lover for around thirteen years. He was said to possess excellent equipment, unbelievable ‘st
Read more

Emperor Elagabalus; the Teenage Pervert

Image
When the emperor Caracalla was murdered in 217, the fourteen-year-old Elagabalus succeeded him. He only ruled for 4 years, but in that short period of time he commited a variety of grotesque and debauched acts, enough to make Caligula and Commodus seem rather plain. His real name was Bassianus but as he developed an intense interest in worshippng the Syrian god Elagabal, became High Priest of the cult and so had his name changed to Elagabalus. To honor his god, he demanded that hundereds of cattle were slaughtered daily on huge sacrificial altars. He had a temple built on the Palatine Hill and ordered the Romans to worship a statue of a giant phallus, which didn't go down very well at all... Eventually he decided he was the god embodied. He started to wear women's clothes and make-up, implored his surgeons to cut his penis off and make him a vagina and when they said tehy could not do this he settled for circumcision. His body is said to have been very effeminate and he had a m
Read more

The Smelly Woad Dyers

Image
Woad leaves Before Indigo was imported from the East in the 16th Century, the only source of rich blue dye was Woad, Isatis Tinctoria, a plant which is a member of the cabbage family and which was brought to Britain by the Celts. They called it Glasto, hence Glastonbury, which means ‘a place where woad grows’. The process by which the dye was extracted was lengthy and very smelly indeed, (think combination of raw sewage and rotten cabbage) and the people who did this work, woad dyers, were outcasts of society, since they smelt so much. As a result they were isolated and inbred. There was no way of hiding if you were a woad dyer as even if you washed yourself really well to remove the stench, the blue dye could be seen on your fingers and under your fingernails. Queen Elizabeth I, not being able to stand the stench from their workshops, decreed that woad dyers should be at least 5 miles away from wherever she was staying. As it took 50 kilos of woad in order to produce 5 kilos of pigme
Read more