Books in Ancient Rome


A bucket of scrolls

Printing did not exist in the ancient world so books were all hadwritten. There was no such thing as paper made of wood pulp either, so papyrus was used, a sheet made of processed papyrus reeds which grew in the Nile region of Egypt. Papyrus was indeed one of Egypt's most important exports.
Papyrus was expensive and it came in several gradings according to quality. A encyclopaedia from around 70 A.D. lists these as:

Grade 1: the Emperor Augustus's own, the finest of all, favoured above all for letter-writing (these were 13-inch sheets)

Grade 2: His wife Livia's own (also 13 inches)

Grade 3: priestly, reserved for Egyptian sacred texts (10-inch sheets)

Grade 4: amphitheatre papyrus, amde at Rome in Fannius' workshop under the amphitheatre and extremely thin (9-inch sheets)

Grade 5: Saite, named after an Egyptian town with low quality papyrus beds (less than 9 inches)

Grade 6: Taeneotic, named after another Egyptian town, sold by weight, not quality

Grade 7: traders', no good for writing on, used for wrapping bundles of finer papyrus or other merchandise (less than 6-inch sheets)

As a nobleman, if you wished to borrow a particular literary work from someone, you would obtain the said scrolls and have your slaves copy them all.
The shape of the book we would recognise today was called a codex and was mainly used to bind documents and was not widely in use.
As for the scrolls, each individual one could not hold a large amount of text so a book would be conprised of a bucket of several scrolls, depending on the size of the work of course.

Comments

Anonymous said…
In Graves' 'I Claudius', an important plot point hinges on a character refusing to burn used paper because, compared to papyris, it's so expensive. Am I right in assuming this was made-up?
Monday, 25 July, 2005
Anna said…
There was no paper in ancient Rome as we know it. Paper from wood pulp was invented by the Chinese around 105 A.D. which was long after Claudius or any of the people starring in 'I Claudius' lived. However, recent archaeological evidence shows that paper may have been known in China as early as 120 B.C. However, these findings are recent and would not have been known during Robert Graves' lifetime.

http://www.ipst.gatech.edu/amp/collection/museum_invention_paper.htm
Monday, 25 July, 2005
Anonymous said…
What about parchment, the lambskin that the Torah was (and is) written on? Was that often used?
Monday, 25 July, 2005
Anonymous said…
Thanks; I generally don't expect 20th-century fictional versions of the past to be accurate, but in Graves' case the fact that he's relied upon accounts from the Roman era - Suetonius, Tacitus - I was more willing to suspend my disbelief .
Monday, 25 July, 2005
Peter Cuthbertson said…
Keep that disbelief suspended. :) I first became interested in Ancient Rome through Graves' I, Claudius, and when later reading histories of the period I was myself astonished at times by how historically accurate the novel was. For example, I had no idea that the letters Augustus and Livia exchanged in the book, regarding the former's eavesdropping on the young Claudius declaiming on a subject of his interest, were real, but I was delighted to find them (as far as I remember) word for word in the histories of the period.
Tuesday, 26 July, 2005
Anna said…
Yes, Robert Graves relied heavily on Suetonius and other ancient texts in order to limit as much as possible the fictional side of things, which is one of the reasons why his novel is so wonderful to read. The majority of things he describes in the book really happened. The idea that Livia was a cold-blooded poisoner has never been established and is pure speculation though...It is however true that Livia exercised a great deal of influence over Augustus, in matters of state as well as in personal ones. She was an extremely clever woman. Augustus adored her but of course he had his mistresses, which she knew about and even encouraged.
Tuesday, 26 July, 2005
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Catherine the Great and her Many Lovers

Image
Catherine the Great was empress of Russia from 1762 until she died in 1796. She was born in 1729 in Poland and in 1744 was taken to Russia to marry the young Grand Duke Peter, heir to the throne and not of a sane mind. For seven years during their marriage Peter spent his time playing with toy soldiers and dogs and showed no interest in sex. In fact he had a physical disability, a very tight foreskin, which may have played an important part in that matter. Finally the empress Elizabeth gave Catherine the permission to take a lover, which she did and was soon pregnant. She convinced Peter it was his own child, as was the plan anyway. In the meantime he had been circumcised so that he could perform the sexual act. Catherine developed a taste for young soldiers. She had a special area built in her bedroom, which was curtained off and where she received her lovers. Gregory Orlov was her on and off lover for around thirteen years. He was said to possess excellent equipment, unbelievable ‘st
Read more

Emperor Elagabalus; the Teenage Pervert

Image
When the emperor Caracalla was murdered in 217, the fourteen-year-old Elagabalus succeeded him. He only ruled for 4 years, but in that short period of time he commited a variety of grotesque and debauched acts, enough to make Caligula and Commodus seem rather plain. His real name was Bassianus but as he developed an intense interest in worshippng the Syrian god Elagabal, became High Priest of the cult and so had his name changed to Elagabalus. To honor his god, he demanded that hundereds of cattle were slaughtered daily on huge sacrificial altars. He had a temple built on the Palatine Hill and ordered the Romans to worship a statue of a giant phallus, which didn't go down very well at all... Eventually he decided he was the god embodied. He started to wear women's clothes and make-up, implored his surgeons to cut his penis off and make him a vagina and when they said tehy could not do this he settled for circumcision. His body is said to have been very effeminate and he had a m
Read more

The Smelly Woad Dyers

Image
Woad leaves Before Indigo was imported from the East in the 16th Century, the only source of rich blue dye was Woad, Isatis Tinctoria, a plant which is a member of the cabbage family and which was brought to Britain by the Celts. They called it Glasto, hence Glastonbury, which means ‘a place where woad grows’. The process by which the dye was extracted was lengthy and very smelly indeed, (think combination of raw sewage and rotten cabbage) and the people who did this work, woad dyers, were outcasts of society, since they smelt so much. As a result they were isolated and inbred. There was no way of hiding if you were a woad dyer as even if you washed yourself really well to remove the stench, the blue dye could be seen on your fingers and under your fingernails. Queen Elizabeth I, not being able to stand the stench from their workshops, decreed that woad dyers should be at least 5 miles away from wherever she was staying. As it took 50 kilos of woad in order to produce 5 kilos of pigme
Read more